CEA/CNRS: A flow cell dedicated to imaging in liquid at the nanoscale

About LIONS: Interdisciplinary Laboratory on Nanoscale and Supramolecular Organization

The Interdisciplinary Laboratory on Nanoscale and Supramolecular Organization (LIONS) is one of the 7 laboratories of NIMBE (Nanoscience and Innovation for Materials, Biomedecine and Energy), a CEA-CNRS joint research belonging to university Paris-Saclay, France. The NIMBE activity is oriented towards the design, processing, and analysis of matter from micron scale to nanoscale, as well as the understanding of physicochemical mechanisms and their synergies. LIONS gathers 15 (soon 16) permanent members and 12 PhD and master students whose activities focus on the understanding and utilization of self-assembly for creating useful and safe supramolecular architectures. They have published more than 500 research papers in some of the most prestigious academic journals, and have filed more than 10 patents since 2006. Today, they focus on 3 main research topics: rational synthesis of nano-objects (nucleation growth, biomineralization …), reactivity at the nanoscale and under confinement (catalysis, radiolysis, energy storage…), nano/bio interactions (nanomedicine, nanotoxicity, diagnostics…)

microfluidics liquide nanoscale

To support these research topics, LIONS has developed its own specific tools (homemade SAXS, irradiation devices, 3D printed specific sample environments, lab on a chip…). Among those tools, microfluidics offers an ideal environment for controlling the synthesis of nano-objects, such as inorganic nanoparticles, and for characterizing the nucleation pathway. Designed to be efficiently coupled to analytical techniques, it should bring a completely renewed understanding of the very early stages of crystallization.”

A pressure-actuated flow cell soft x-ray spectromicroscopy in liquid media

Fluidic actuation of the flow cell
Figure 1: Fluidic actuation of the flow cell. (a) Photograph of the whole system. (b) Corresponding diagram of the various parts.


In a paper published in July 2020 in collaboration with the ENS Paris and the SOLEIL synchrotron, LIONS researchers present and fully characterize a flow cell dedicated to imaging in liquid at the nanoscale1. Its use as a routine sample environment for soft X-ray spectromicroscopy is demonstrated through the spectral analysis of inorganic particles in water.

Transmission spectromicroscopes relying on electron or soft X-ray beams are classically employed to image and characterize samples at the micro- and nanoscales, in fields like materials science, geology, and biology. As these approaches are subject to experimental constraints such as micrometer sample thickness, and a vacuum environment, there is a huge interest in performing in situ studies. Today this is mainly done by using closed flow cells with an electron-transparent window (usually silicon nitride membranes) to tightly isolate the liquid sample from the microscope vacuum. Today, many in situ TEM studies exist, but a few of them have utilized closed cells for in situ scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM). The latter is complementary to STEM as it can provide both structural and chemical information on larger objects, like biological cells, with fewer artefacts and a suitable spatial resolution.

flow cell photographs
Figure 2: Structure of the flow cell photographs of the internal sides of both chips and (a’) corresponding cross-section diagram of their assembly


To fill this gap, the LIONS laboratory and collaborators have developed a dedicated sample environment for STXM. They worked on the design, the hydrodynamic characterization, and the full validation of a new fluidic system allowing imaging by STXM in liquid environment. The central element of this system is a flow cell that channels the liquid between two silicon chips supporting the SiN windows. More specifically, these two chips form a silicon chamber, a few microns thick, and are arranged in a holder with micromachined fluidic access ports (Fig. 2). Fluid is actuated using a Fluigent pressure controller MFCS-EZ, which applies a controlled gas pressure on top of the solution to be injected (Fig. 1b). Fluigent M-switch and 2-switch valves are respectively used to select the working fluid and to choose the fluidic pathway, either through or bypassing the cell.

Response of the flow cell to fluidic actuation

The authors varied the applied pressure difference, ΔP, while recording the flow rate, both upstream and downstream of the flow cell, using two Fluigent flowmeters. The stepwise variation of the inlet pressure resulted in similarly stepwise changes in the flow rate values, , with no detectable transients (Fig. 3).

This result was attributed to the quality of the pressure controller and to the rigidity of both tubes and flow cell. Identical values recorded by the two flowmeters confirmed that there were no leaks in the microfluidic system.

Response of the flow cell to variations of the actuation pressure difference
Figure 3: Response of the flow cell to variations of the actuation pressure difference 

Scanning transmission soft X-ray spectromicroscopy in water

The authors also demonstrated proof-of-principle observations by performing in-situ observations of calcium carbonate nanoparticles. A typical image of mineral precipitate in aqueous medium, acquired at the Ca L2-edge, is shown in Fig. 6a. XAS measurements were performed to confirm that calcium is present within the particles and almost undetectable in the surrounding liquid (Fig. 6b). X-ray absorption spectra of the precipitate could be recorded, thus allowing to specify the amorphous state of the probed material, by analyzing the peak positions (Fig. 6c).

In situ observation of calcium carbonate nanoparticle
Figure 4: In situ observation of calcium carbonate nanoparticles (a) STXM images, (b) Hyperspectral image displaying the transmitted intensity along the yellow dashed line displayed in (a), (c) Optical density spectrum of the precipitate

“The stepwise variation of the inlet pressure resulted in similarly stepwise changes in the flow rate values, with no detectable transients. This result was attributed to the quality of the pressure controller […]”

Corinne Chevallard – NIMBE/LIONS,  CEA-CNRS

For more information or a technical discussion

Contact us